{"id":"W2606159587","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.049","title":"Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Model to Identify the Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Urology","topic":"Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nomogram; Medicine; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Logistic regression; Receiver operating characteristic; Lymph node; Cutoff; Stage (stratigraphy); Dissection (medical); Biopsy; Urology; Prostate-specific antigen; Cancer; Radiology; Oncology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001832417,0.0007896327,0.000794015,0.0007359034,0.0003957402,0.001455854,0.001878818,0.0009182111,0.002656769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003852866,0.0003802568,0.001017143,0.0003764188,0.0004633154,0.0007114758,0.0008873211,0.0007692856,0.0005463465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001040777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002355844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01992373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01337718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995021,0.0001528861,0.00002771855,0.0001359356,0.00009058521,0.00009080542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981237,0.001081933,0.0001646175,0.0001344824,0.0004099542,0.0000852289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002347218,0.0001790459,0.01162576,0.00005885396,0.0001014499,0.00008776442,0.00003294715,0.9642955,0.001758139,0.001965449,0.001090674,0.01856971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001421444,0.00003089871,0.0006625472,0.000005278223,0.00001822876,0.00001323294,0.000007127385,0.9978216,0.0004498569,0.0006955689,0.0002773296,0.00000412947],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4444957,0.0004387608,0.5403446,0.0008387496,0.000238814,0.0003854778,0.003026701,0.002277705,0.007953438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084481,0.0001875759,0.08514828,0.0001602644,0.00005157342,0.0003104536,0.002198738,0.0001223505,0.003372761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01992373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03961557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04179921712873153,"score_gpt":0.3441445441825115,"score_spread":0.30234532705378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}