{"id":"W2606182161","doi":"10.1177/1556264617696920","title":"Recognizing Risk and Vulnerability in Research Ethics: Imagining the “What Ifs?”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Research ethics; Qualitative research; Human research; Theme (computing); Engineering ethics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Social science; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7156664,0.0004479766,0.001342351,0.003875637,0.01416883,0.004643632,0.005382719,0.003498574,0.0002619564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8797287,0.0002954067,0.0004641069,0.002486027,0.02713881,0.001438941,0.005343654,0.2722506,0.0001793149],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002115967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01718383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002759271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006821457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8638944,0.08050192,0.00343526,0.002169872,0.04488022,0.00511835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.218637,0.7186768,0.0009570586,0.006085049,0.05243673,0.00320741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02046552,0.008303636,0.5261591,0.007290248,0.0009816122,0.01093239,0.1121687,0.00006002904,0.007038646,0.140106,0.03340115,0.133093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004894485,0.0102513,0.2286758,0.01191308,0.00003361004,0.0001718893,0.03487687,0.000493198,0.001290139,0.683112,0.02385517,0.0004324464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6251037,0.00262979,0.00002192972,0.3587301,0.0002988588,0.001481328,0.000009039696,0.00002476004,0.01170055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932303,0.06193664,0.0006856955,0.001135062,0.001726036,0.00008910492,0.000002574546,0.0001195797,0.002002354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6452574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9768887008413649,"score_gpt":0.8180332263880681,"score_spread":0.1588554744532968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}