{"id":"W2606182161","doi":"10.1177/1556264617696920","title":"Recognizing Risk and Vulnerability in Research Ethics: Imagining the “What Ifs?”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Research ethics; Qualitative research; Human research; Theme (computing); Engineering ethics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Social science; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2780672,0.001537375,0.001539962,0.003992889,0.01843126,0.02313765,0.004523162,0.01262946,0.001775187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2543263,0.00194007,0.001403054,0.002633656,0.1046221,0.04644435,0.02382213,0.02022853,0.0006569508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01113454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02782472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002686603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003336576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5251752,0.4469254,0.007339367,0.004160916,0.01206917,0.004329913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5625053,0.3724055,0.02127738,0.01595378,0.01949707,0.00836101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003690077,0.00004438853,0.002171111,0.0004695946,0.0000297511,0.000632179,0.8859723,0.0002562384,0.0007395888,0.0949835,0.001879238,0.01278518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002630209,0.00009275623,0.0008773718,0.001794432,0.00003346819,0.00136145,0.7543778,0.001055662,0.0009927485,0.1991042,0.04018291,0.0001008761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2115826,0.01035545,0.2005404,0.523509,0.002776487,0.001487273,0.00005543834,0.000229855,0.0494635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9075973,0.00373803,0.06361506,0.0213989,0.000466863,0.001075862,0.00002048072,0.0001246092,0.00196288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8902717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9768887008413649,"score_gpt":0.8180332263880681,"score_spread":0.1588554744532968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}