{"id":"W2606422401","doi":"10.1177/0021998317704708","title":"Probabilistic first ply failure prediction of composite laminates using a multi-scale M-SaF and Bayesian inference approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Composite laminates; Materials science; Micromechanics; Bayesian inference; Probabilistic logic; Cantilever; Structural engineering; Computer science; Bayesian probability; Algorithm; Composite material; Composite number; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004385983,0.0002736307,0.0007486815,0.0001619932,0.0002267372,0.0003569566,0.0004977374,0.0001569073,0.00002476242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006282911,0.0002430669,0.0000953264,0.00005615591,0.0001441359,0.0005166385,0.0001492046,0.0002033432,0.000001504328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006509754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002001186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002375856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005284052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982123,0.00008499783,0.0009608753,0.0001760772,0.0003160282,0.0002496579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984034,0.0001064574,0.0007010669,0.0004003378,0.0002269098,0.0001618424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007762924,0.0001161386,0.006471217,0.0004483621,0.00006790433,0.00001105038,0.0002259136,0.004128891,0.9882511,0.00005650455,0.00001109812,0.0001342248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001791366,0.0003269348,0.1308272,0.001213798,0.0003772705,0.0003106582,0.00003654089,0.06858923,0.7957727,0.0002996495,0.00006793834,0.0003867842],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662045,0.0001770956,0.03267782,0.00004113144,0.000441757,0.0002787295,0.0000882514,0.00004656519,0.00004412124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422887,0.00004600626,0.05747465,0.000004126201,0.0001304228,0.000004927888,0.000008012926,0.00003826389,0.000004914582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1924784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02781491943929545,"score_gpt":0.2576115353439697,"score_spread":0.2297966159046743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}