{"id":"W2606456276","doi":"10.14796/jwmm.r227-22","title":"Identifying Potential Pipe Failures: Toronto Case Study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Management Modeling","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Forensic engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008625358,0.0007934663,0.0003908545,0.001318183,0.002492525,0.0009442582,0.001415086,0.002399416,0.004983845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004477221,0.0004322514,0.0006127169,0.0023599,0.001243088,0.0007248838,0.0009319565,0.0007901701,0.0003952655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01109907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005898345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7511984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8638966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993635,0.0001927104,0.00003579016,0.00008197748,0.0001561274,0.0001699499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995851,0.002509498,0.0002888901,0.0001811259,0.0006677756,0.0005017494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001895503,0.001850515,0.1846543,0.0006013606,0.0002717698,0.03927391,0.007156517,0.6526843,0.004819867,0.008679452,0.02892443,0.06918804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00105702,0.001819528,0.178504,0.0002005388,0.0003610311,0.003592337,0.023784,0.7590002,0.005374013,0.004843944,0.02118702,0.0002764692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746695,0.0003340741,0.006609223,0.001353791,0.0000200794,0.0003731498,0.002440455,0.0001745561,0.01402511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989809,0.0003462436,0.004278779,0.00008600904,0.00001202553,0.00006178107,0.0009698768,0.00001960823,0.004416604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2488016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5005338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0155712542085603,"score_gpt":0.2358953966530882,"score_spread":0.2203241424445279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}