{"id":"W2607828866","doi":"10.1139/f2012-044","title":"Assessing the sensitivity and specificity of fish community indicators to management action","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Trophic level; Fishery; Fisheries management; Ecological indicator; Environmental science; Fish stock; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Statistics; Ecosystem; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01892724,0.0008806973,0.00105411,0.002158001,0.0004067832,0.001248412,0.0006839103,0.001142009,0.0005661983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07440672,0.0005238111,0.00125052,0.0008978222,0.001099798,0.001701006,0.001906676,0.0008127866,0.0001409895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007299421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005494287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005844511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004321724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934007,0.003423707,0.0004931706,0.001333026,0.000927583,0.0004218398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9368124,0.04728073,0.007854638,0.003662541,0.003412726,0.000976971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004827893,0.00009216666,0.8934651,0.00009278771,0.00105196,0.0001122768,0.0003171252,0.0859277,0.004456011,0.0002923436,0.00006475174,0.01364512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002604204,0.0009929991,0.6786032,0.00003427945,0.0003281512,0.0002338461,0.0002594397,0.3138139,0.003719778,0.001616398,0.0002655275,0.0001064992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905853,0.0001142162,0.008265554,0.00006562872,0.000005139967,0.00003996642,0.0001295898,0.00004469744,0.0007498881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998143,0.00002172926,0.001630347,0.00001753875,0.000003099381,0.00001084221,0.00009557265,0.000005201298,0.00007269355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05810300023825125,"score_gpt":0.2913283648758499,"score_spread":0.2332253646375987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}