{"id":"W2608092431","doi":"10.15837/ijccc.2017.3.2759","title":"A Conceptual Framework for Artificial Creativity in Visual Arts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computers Communications & Control","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Anthropocentrism; Embodied cognition; Cognitive science; Computational creativity; Computer science; Creativity technique; The arts; Perception; Conceptual framework; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Sociology; Visual arts; Social psychology; Art; Social science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007608106,0.0001167601,0.0002636476,0.0002624659,0.0002923832,0.0002797885,0.002698749,0.00007649649,0.00008357076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00126536,0.0001176775,0.000165803,0.00006065936,0.0005672635,0.0003686068,0.0001587741,0.0003678056,0.00001653349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009733553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001461688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004664745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005593289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985665,0.0002238181,0.0005830522,0.0001581581,0.0002915798,0.0001768697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951543,0.002414391,0.0009436569,0.0008469439,0.0005540343,0.00008663838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007265306,0.002055306,0.02910889,0.00000156204,0.0002112638,0.0000219932,0.005068513,0.0001384075,0.0008941155,0.8888804,0.001694682,0.07119828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01350891,0.001432515,0.7090358,0.0006339993,0.0001598282,0.0004533285,0.005124092,0.03286969,0.000663691,0.09586092,0.1393533,0.0009039405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3026416,0.0002032568,0.6449164,0.04215346,0.007213561,0.0004399116,0.00005023638,0.00002115758,0.002360439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872074,0.00002759301,0.01124828,0.0009406838,0.0004616592,0.0000379867,0.000004042706,0.00001018159,0.00006213128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7930195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5014992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1201142592849399,"score_gpt":0.4794573801354725,"score_spread":0.3593431208505325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}