{"id":"W2608189678","doi":"10.1016/j.molliq.2017.04.132","title":"Folic acid–chitosan conjugation: A new drug delivery tool","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Molecular Liquids","topic":"Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Chitosan; Conjugate; Chemistry; Folic acid; Drug delivery; Polymer; Aqueous solution; Nuclear chemistry; Nanoparticle; Drug; van der Waals force; Organic chemistry; Materials science; Nanotechnology; Pharmacology; Molecule","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007586748,0.000196725,0.0003574461,0.0001235336,0.0002930512,0.0004389528,0.000988774,0.0000815323,0.0002627139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004087562,0.0001757998,0.0002444734,0.00007374077,0.0001451834,0.0008355225,0.0001887876,0.0002194847,0.0001749404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006370782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005741409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006788295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008171725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978765,0.0001487412,0.0006577034,0.000222038,0.0007046431,0.0003903558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978406,0.00005013958,0.0008145636,0.000749306,0.000231974,0.0003133635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002249023,0.00006766617,0.0002215945,0.00001124722,0.00002968382,0.0004756727,0.0001758782,0.0001113694,0.9936027,0.0003658551,0.002565329,0.002148089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001424675,0.000272809,0.0009049698,0.0001035407,0.00008345471,0.0001804093,0.00003807784,0.00006462954,0.9944253,0.0008113268,0.001481835,0.0002089807],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924439,0.0008513106,0.002297349,0.002663537,0.001045842,0.0001206052,0.000005302478,0.0000272912,0.0005448429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935697,0.0000366254,0.00488592,0.0007682936,0.000575263,0.000002260098,7.645e-7,0.00002847494,0.0001326742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002588571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7168908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01142724077417815,"score_gpt":0.2500949661909699,"score_spread":0.2386677254167918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}