{"id":"W2609029599","doi":"","title":"Composite Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Panels with Group-Specific Heterogeneity and Spatially Dependent Errors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation - Québec; Compute Canada; Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Estimator; Quasi-maximum likelihood; Mathematics; Covariate; Group (periodic table); Oracle; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Algorithm; Expectation–maximization algorithm; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Maximum likelihood","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006199838,0.0005676453,0.001514841,0.0006493187,0.0005285088,0.0000851447,0.001657179,0.0003384905,0.0001557273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006571196,0.0006940603,0.0004835924,0.0001403351,0.0009290439,0.0003074101,0.001849495,0.0007579823,0.00002773735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001983784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001364103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02168453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02910996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970888,0.0001701439,0.0007778376,0.001220634,0.0002720539,0.000470491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955647,0.0001851004,0.002016893,0.001814404,0.0001444451,0.0002744556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01164028,0.008401164,0.4936208,0.01052871,0.01759154,0.001405301,0.09395509,0.02377512,0.003903757,0.0167535,0.0005186592,0.3179061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005719235,0.001685638,0.6500001,0.001985805,0.001018442,0.00009193531,0.003485053,0.292249,0.0001646224,0.03715477,0.003510046,0.002935319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9380205,0.002099812,0.04848618,0.0003302796,0.0001677956,0.0006101744,0.007160343,0.00004920756,0.003075676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758421,0.004949941,0.01708083,0.00001758621,0.00002691378,0.000002372245,0.001867408,0.00005099399,0.0001618932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3149708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02641904700880125,"score_gpt":0.2152573119902391,"score_spread":0.1888382649814378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}