{"id":"W2609085856","doi":"10.1016/j.canrad.2017.01.008","title":"Impact of X-ray energy on absorbed dose assessed with Monte Carlo simulations in a mouse tumor and in nearest organs irradiated with kilovoltage X-ray beams","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cancer/Radiothérapie","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Absorbed dose; Irradiation; Nuclear medicine; Radiation; Physics; X-ray; Materials science; Spinal cord; Dosimetry; Medicine; Optics; Nuclear physics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007905582,0.0003944467,0.0006223873,0.0002653753,0.0001570983,0.0001029592,0.0003380197,0.00007079439,0.0001024273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001233345,0.0003095421,0.00006862254,0.0003009874,0.000272294,0.000456936,0.00002755657,0.0002889274,2.030432e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003408495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003444522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01526592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001882258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984688,0.00005233238,0.0003384903,0.0004951556,0.0002045924,0.0004406903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984497,0.0001047698,0.0004111109,0.0007895401,0.00009179021,0.0001530715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009262353,0.0005125885,0.67912,0.0000261803,0.000287829,0.00004375989,0.0007914405,0.2679935,0.0472644,0.0002671223,0.00004752369,0.00271948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008983868,0.001406319,0.9506344,0.0004683908,0.00005303577,0.000002407439,0.00009873688,0.03211896,0.004587286,0.0001043888,0.0006575655,0.0008845961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919013,0.0002665413,0.006722876,0.00005501438,0.00002699368,0.0004880925,0.0003111423,0.0000599199,0.0001680999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950197,0.00006880861,0.004390988,0.00003361061,0.00009532429,0.0001302736,0.00001931297,0.00009912153,0.0001428877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2715145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009468152044001041,"score_gpt":0.2895956330541481,"score_spread":0.2801274810101471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}