{"id":"W2610185656","doi":"10.1177/0261927x17706943","title":"The Strategic Manipulation of Linguistic Complexity: A Test of Two Models of Lying","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Lying; Deception; Cognitive complexity; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Dialectic; Test (biology); Strategic communication; Computational model; Presentation (obstetrics); Value (mathematics); Strategic interaction; Linguistics; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01074053,0.0008594029,0.0007526829,0.001152675,0.0007840747,0.00370217,0.00173589,0.001859137,0.006352482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07710183,0.000822066,0.001003693,0.0004489673,0.005604466,0.009624776,0.004327795,0.002336193,0.0004836927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001197956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001025584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008049338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000345297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992953,0.002665687,0.0005410087,0.00153478,0.001890611,0.0004148556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8733677,0.08268343,0.0248221,0.01451752,0.002452273,0.002156914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0300467,0.01062162,0.2559417,0.003001137,0.001496927,0.001218243,0.07004878,0.0118275,0.1561321,0.2724131,0.001387301,0.1858649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002899287,0.01765999,0.5060371,0.0005633894,0.001103891,0.001522353,0.0140425,0.1335305,0.03246316,0.2858996,0.003662664,0.0006155652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743318,0.0001227779,0.01272631,0.0007447536,0.00004296966,0.0002366846,0.00006498165,0.00003628063,0.01169348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941684,0.00007450131,0.004704669,0.0002192986,0.00002657171,0.0002707627,0.00006144269,0.00002244681,0.0004518793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01074053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05680203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.183781785716556,"score_gpt":0.4494699223111631,"score_spread":0.265688136594607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}