{"id":"W2610393494","doi":"10.1149/ma2010-02/10/810","title":"An Approach to Conduct In situ Characterization of Anode Electrode Designs for Reformate Applications","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ECS Meeting Abstracts","topic":"Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ballard Power Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Anode; In situ; Characterization (materials science); Electrode; Catalytic reforming; Materials science; Process engineering; Political science; Chemical engineering; Computer science; Chemistry; Catalysis; Nanotechnology; Engineering; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004689124,0.0006012437,0.000470311,0.0003892595,0.000495115,0.0007621835,0.000914754,0.0008004779,0.003093404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007752302,0.0004131698,0.0003115385,0.000280817,0.0002892563,0.000796569,0.0003495382,0.001180311,0.001046965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003831623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004561513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006673278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002565148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997317,0.00003883916,0.00001695725,0.00005375591,0.0001377383,0.00002095539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996387,0.0000762866,0.00003856347,0.00009804813,0.0001342788,0.00001402228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001062333,0.00002482823,0.00002764834,0.00004759401,0.000003365758,0.000007943228,0.00001512767,0.00007366191,0.9964206,0.0002111181,0.0001038811,0.003053702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004192469,0.00006431322,0.0001590126,0.000002439897,0.000007008006,0.00003481347,0.00001389655,0.001138611,0.9957487,0.00007788138,0.00274612,0.000003082836],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.224991,0.001293006,0.7578495,0.0007426478,0.0003545279,0.001110511,0.002023174,0.001758187,0.009877478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4920839,0.001764143,0.4868831,0.0003068487,0.00005973689,0.001034059,0.001456842,0.0003188644,0.01609256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003093404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01034844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02186766938531399,"score_gpt":0.2679350791250787,"score_spread":0.2460674097397647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}