{"id":"W2610406203","doi":"10.1177/1070496517707305","title":"The Effect of the Nepal Community Forestry Program on Equity in Benefit Sharing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Environment & Development","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Livelihood; Poverty; Indigenous; Business; Community forestry; Environmental resource management; Public economics; Forest management; Environmental planning; Geography; Forestry; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Agriculture; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00305381,0.0001332439,0.0001458225,0.00001930181,0.001812252,0.00006226964,0.002003556,0.00003553621,0.00007134417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005231382,0.00005996436,0.00008249949,0.00004190185,0.0004546365,0.00008061488,0.002212553,0.0003880305,0.00002194947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003920397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008576436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002451769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003473824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985455,0.000164668,0.0003470393,0.00008541415,0.0006379695,0.0002193743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985277,0.000176555,0.0005556343,0.0006903086,0.000003419838,0.00004636789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001306989,0.0001530674,0.9310878,0.00001026607,0.00004144822,0.000001850176,0.001146517,0.002750478,0.0001569258,0.00000749027,0.00009303523,0.06442042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004930653,0.0002349843,0.9861655,0.00006093668,0.00003203604,0.00000291561,0.0002480068,0.00006828066,0.002020491,0.0002069777,0.01039496,0.00007188893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948837,0.00003337756,0.000006450122,0.001303138,0.0001103975,0.0004131084,6.421994e-7,0.000002772585,0.003246447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992265,0.0001279898,0.00008823795,0.00007474257,0.00001532517,0.000006842508,3.895049e-7,0.000005067922,0.0004549678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06434853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02680274615177294,"score_gpt":0.2646276186117439,"score_spread":0.237824872459971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}