{"id":"W2610785027","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.04.049","title":"Evaluation of triclosan in Minnesota lakes and rivers: Part I – ecological risk assessment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Colgate-Palmolive Company","keywords":"Triclosan; Environmental science; Biota; Effluent; Sediment; Surface water; Environmental chemistry; Aquatic ecosystem; Risk assessment; Aquatic toxicology; Water quality; Triclocarban; Environmental risk assessment; Toxicity; Ecology; Environmental engineering; Biology; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00122059,0.000438882,0.0003157417,0.0006746475,0.000568399,0.001135719,0.0005001785,0.0003076237,0.0003957715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00102658,0.0002152164,0.0004947754,0.0004846744,0.0003297841,0.0003699049,0.0004583371,0.0001773211,0.00007182471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004748937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1730069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2773169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991036,0.0002753805,0.00006371471,0.0001094508,0.0003953759,0.00005241154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993629,0.00009855509,0.0001612609,0.00002556896,0.0003102142,0.00004146984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002390571,0.0007130991,0.6965886,0.0006945354,0.0008644915,0.0005529422,0.0009393789,0.1021276,0.09343026,0.001126146,0.001096356,0.09947601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001842015,0.008097238,0.671069,0.0002117368,0.001685072,0.0004677559,0.002626308,0.1457759,0.1583114,0.0007489668,0.01071654,0.0001057586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963723,0.0004009619,0.001090645,0.00005493576,0.000002001428,0.00006406338,0.0001876705,0.000008594669,0.001818808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949155,0.0006238565,0.002099029,0.00002778486,0.000002025589,0.00002977346,0.0002659012,0.000004656344,0.002031408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1730069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3439999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03522966239899054,"score_gpt":0.3140648536940532,"score_spread":0.2788351912950626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}