{"id":"W2610795005","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.2946v1","title":"Defending scientific integrity in conservation policy processes: lessons from Canada, Australia, and the United States","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Political science; Public relations; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Government (linguistics); Uncertainty; Scientific integrity; Publication; Scientific evidence; Business; Public administration; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02986623,0.0006505148,0.001459438,0.004672537,0.02639408,0.01649207,0.003433385,0.006085129,0.002950235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06524046,0.0005854744,0.0009819092,0.00763695,0.01886,0.007921582,0.007181113,0.009968053,0.0002329885],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2277218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4668637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.974941,0.007134766,0.0008591282,0.001234787,0.008426056,0.007404168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9145131,0.02983816,0.002446351,0.002749952,0.04071965,0.00973272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004656011,0.000350141,0.05471048,0.001571704,0.0003887443,0.002219914,0.1195669,0.00791757,0.0006944833,0.4881408,0.08611287,0.2378608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002493439,0.0002357443,0.1379329,0.006683549,0.0006684788,0.000480098,0.1380099,0.007486259,0.001541166,0.1901531,0.5158819,0.0006775915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1671383,0.05154886,0.004030011,0.5539152,0.001603254,0.0003743221,0.0004904132,0.0001343493,0.2207653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8933347,0.03091735,0.007901568,0.05001215,0.0003275632,0.0001735541,0.000223533,0.00009355871,0.01701602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8957333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07922032677131031,"score_gpt":0.337610782119407,"score_spread":0.2583904553480967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}