{"id":"W2610795005","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.2946v1","title":"Defending scientific integrity in conservation policy processes: lessons from Canada, Australia, and the United States","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Political science; Public relations; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Government (linguistics); Uncertainty; Scientific integrity; Publication; Scientific evidence; Business; Public administration; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001089184,0.0002237173,0.0002492653,0.0001643997,0.0005710001,0.0004948401,0.0006527696,0.0001903325,0.0005820193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002289098,0.0001798109,0.00002270945,0.0004541271,0.001225067,0.0002380689,0.0007416906,0.0006064095,0.00001995016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001224048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001654871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981391,0.0002192403,0.0003909313,0.0006482138,0.0003080582,0.0002944871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980871,0.0006713062,0.0004157669,0.0006578521,0.00007719523,0.00009075999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001698573,0.0000322231,0.9761683,0.00003817525,0.00001419408,9.854239e-7,0.00183654,0.0009438929,0.00001764478,0.0008284572,0.01996986,0.0001326935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003849925,0.000002890069,0.9617246,0.00007876359,0.0000213425,0.00000119665,0.0008569175,0.004879989,0.00005046451,0.02322799,0.00856496,0.0002058868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9116662,0.00001774467,0.00007525137,0.08655389,0.0005764773,0.0005959602,0.0001281198,0.00001978802,0.0003665605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949067,0.00005442116,0.0004390992,0.001150564,0.00006391088,0.0001262709,0.0008107738,0.00001083241,0.002437395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08540332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7332476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07922032677131031,"score_gpt":0.337610782119407,"score_spread":0.2583904553480967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}