{"id":"W2611359722","doi":"10.1680/jmacr.16.00447","title":"Potential for using recycled glass sand in engineered cementitious composites","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Magazine of Concrete Research","topic":"Innovative concrete reinforcement materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Curing (chemistry); Calcium silicate hydrate; Compressive strength; Flexural strength; Scanning electron microscope; Cement; Alkali–silica reaction; Composite number; Sodium silicate; Calcium silicate; Cementitious; Aluminium; Glass fiber","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001325731,0.0001857289,0.0004237403,0.0004572503,0.0001943734,0.0002019722,0.0004945502,0.0001138994,0.0001488994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002793723,0.0002022617,0.00007026196,0.0001846925,0.0002094841,0.0002949975,0.0001777496,0.0001813333,0.0000153517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001368944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005584349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006426193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004137464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981483,0.00007185029,0.0005182512,0.0002137163,0.0004345836,0.0006132877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986543,0.00015222,0.0001004317,0.0005192187,0.0005096641,0.00006415851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001314553,0.000001798504,0.000153743,0.0003645288,0.00007076701,0.0000134557,0.00003782428,0.001264477,0.993932,0.002998597,0.0006477768,0.0003835928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003043896,0.0001811778,0.0009912554,0.00023917,0.00001784466,0.000004829726,0.00002442771,0.3374867,0.6542213,0.0003921285,0.003096843,0.0003004803],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654649,0.0001940016,0.0198847,0.00007863075,0.0003952141,0.0008350511,0.00009611869,0.00006578818,0.01298561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996224,0.00005726361,0.003150088,0.000005690003,0.0001707193,0.00006138938,0.00004892392,0.0000543147,0.0002275643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3397107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8247994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05840774875241783,"score_gpt":0.3480521789876215,"score_spread":0.2896444302352036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}