{"id":"W2611486316","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000405","title":"Factor Structure of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Psychology; Confirmatory factor analysis; Reliability (semiconductor); Scale (ratio); Goodness of fit; Factor analysis; Exploratory factor analysis; Statistics; Psychometrics; Measurement invariance; Econometrics; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004626588,0.0001549173,0.0002511036,0.00005002543,0.0002687408,0.0000470649,0.001164456,0.00006737305,0.001642057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003707077,0.00007980893,0.0002592779,0.00005555002,0.0002758553,0.0000881439,0.0001461397,0.0006645346,0.00002916924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004568608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001202679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001353518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997936,0.0006951106,0.0006186205,0.0001814435,0.0003683646,0.0002004632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976173,0.00005661888,0.001381648,0.000729956,0.0001074374,0.0001070492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001712981,0.001132829,0.9336385,0.00001375459,0.0003286339,0.0001328297,0.0009169801,0.00008943796,0.008889975,0.008321034,0.007169198,0.03919552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001073633,0.0005326815,0.9954084,0.00004162026,0.00005251791,0.00008829884,0.0001395687,0.000009536438,0.00003237234,0.0005899759,0.001938279,0.00009315924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9405541,0.0001770157,0.002291344,0.001368468,0.004001508,0.0001567538,0.00002242213,0.000008349171,0.05142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631,0.00002304525,0.00187048,0.0001762125,0.0003949165,4.562349e-7,0.000001226216,0.00001628041,0.001207372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06176985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05281354364904125,"score_gpt":0.4448605913552937,"score_spread":0.3920470477062524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}