{"id":"W2611784829","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0176773","title":"Mosasauroid phylogeny under multiple phylogenetic methods provides new insights on the evolution of aquatic adaptations in the group","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts; Willi Hennig Society","keywords":"Paraphyly; Phylogenetic tree; Maximum parsimony; Biology; Phylogenetics; Evolutionary biology; Lineage (genetic); Bayesian probability; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Clade; Zoology; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009055557,0.0004214559,0.0004812025,0.001851795,0.000913472,0.001016238,0.0003851299,0.0006071054,0.00133674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001765979,0.0003213869,0.0007972479,0.001441882,0.0004398402,0.0008096726,0.001007399,0.0005997356,0.0003609104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000314933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003630302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006342654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00232214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996011,0.00013457,0.00004916814,0.0001282637,0.00006007643,0.00002686525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991352,0.0003515029,0.0002412215,0.0001039263,0.00009384904,0.00007440124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008630795,0.0001006046,0.4290306,0.001115645,0.001404456,0.001186333,0.005394901,0.01525075,0.3578966,0.007918606,0.0006698543,0.1791686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005379864,0.0004414668,0.9094238,0.0003414441,0.001044146,0.00232615,0.001660365,0.06237627,0.00730532,0.005695572,0.009213655,0.0001180629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.976612,0.001220195,0.02002309,0.00008733969,0.00001126674,0.00001446587,0.000412559,0.00009313138,0.001525984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737293,0.0004157258,0.02451562,0.00003646014,0.00001648986,0.00002066468,0.0009600024,0.00004158799,0.0002640411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001851795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004789114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0961571582228219,"score_gpt":0.2691814573596554,"score_spread":0.1730242991368335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}