{"id":"W2611967612","doi":"10.1140/epjb/e2017-80038-3","title":"Strain engineering of graphene nanoribbons: pseudomagnetic versus external magnetic fields","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Physical Journal B","topic":"Graphene research and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Magnetic field; Graphene; Condensed matter physics; Strain engineering; Ripple; Strain (injury); Band gap; Spintronics; Graphene nanoribbons; Coupling (piping); Spin (aerodynamics); Materials science; Optoelectronics; Physics; Nanotechnology; Ferromagnetism","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008327293,0.000244301,0.0001344358,0.0002086392,0.0002186476,0.0004167284,0.0002579816,0.000266311,0.002468524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002363241,0.0001012956,0.00009888843,0.0001700758,0.0002575883,0.0002418959,0.0002094205,0.0002506069,0.0002730539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002441606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008717469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002763428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008508231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999317,0.00001017906,0.000004410242,0.0000126087,0.00002168271,0.0000193911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999177,0.00002017262,0.0000197909,0.00001752541,0.00001151082,0.00001318693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002330404,0.00005425096,0.0001786266,0.0001518017,0.00001076651,0.0001168547,0.00005842613,0.001662532,0.982345,0.006320697,0.0003825758,0.008485371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005653945,0.0001820521,0.001481648,0.00002120992,0.00001680467,0.0001467634,0.00009436646,0.01793892,0.9741521,0.002401435,0.003487591,0.00002044459],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747179,0.0007131401,0.004680178,0.0003636589,0.0001447342,0.00001273762,0.00009736502,0.0001297006,0.01914064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997145,0.0001717072,0.001261488,0.00002734087,0.000009836998,0.000004622642,0.00003103858,0.00002593964,0.001322935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002468524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008258045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02284887711547258,"score_gpt":0.2769551773641992,"score_spread":0.2541063002487267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}