{"id":"W2612114212","doi":"10.1071/wf16170","title":"Evaluation of the Canadian Precipitation Analysis (CaPA) to improve forest fire danger rating","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Bell (Canada); Ontario Forest Research Institute; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Precipitation; Meteorology; Environmental science; Radar; Climatology; Doppler radar; Tornado; Computer science; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005672914,0.0008251648,0.0004689902,0.00178511,0.001217705,0.001148546,0.001327621,0.0002840813,0.002537443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01869804,0.0002228256,0.0005244561,0.002364691,0.0002040513,0.0005394848,0.0008420375,0.0005241063,0.0003513157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007786328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01467024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9466538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9536691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977552,0.0005252775,0.0001077811,0.0002542762,0.001190473,0.0001670286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861863,0.002025276,0.0004623634,0.0004235787,0.01037446,0.0005280842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014176,0.0005008045,0.3297644,0.0004727328,0.0004094809,0.0001506685,0.0006975922,0.08945089,0.005817026,0.002614104,0.02803849,0.5406663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002589894,0.0003962455,0.5122405,0.0001084568,0.000262892,0.00009327385,0.0007298697,0.4634078,0.00423039,0.0004699571,0.01764908,0.0001524591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8647538,0.00149413,0.07970058,0.001528118,0.0003456912,0.001360937,0.01903327,0.003272723,0.02851075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8662782,0.0005663698,0.1200264,0.0001618212,0.00004048328,0.0002813943,0.00809277,0.0001867472,0.004365626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05334622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1073207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01415969930520334,"score_gpt":0.2760836837683144,"score_spread":0.2619239844631111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}