{"id":"W2612245049","doi":"10.1111/ecog.02869","title":"Environmental marginality and geographic range limits: a case study with <i>Arabidopsis lyrata</i> ssp. <i>lyrata</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Niche; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Ecological niche; Environmental niche modelling; Biology; Environmental change; Species distribution; Geography; Climate change; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003419491,0.0003162914,0.0002686448,0.00006881315,0.001278963,0.0003179205,0.0003837362,0.00007736011,0.00717568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001099432,0.0002668546,0.0001197868,0.0001925811,0.001047709,0.0005583157,0.0003194684,0.000190334,0.0002450319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007266634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003661112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002123242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006031486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981469,0.00007777707,0.000229189,0.000682154,0.000403055,0.0004609537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985011,0.00003132056,0.0002034538,0.0009786887,0.00000590246,0.0002795546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007409901,0.0005951081,0.9942586,0.000007423219,0.00004816272,0.00104156,0.000327064,4.282152e-7,0.0001811108,0.00001624806,0.001504727,0.001945434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001675344,0.000464458,0.975677,0.000007126143,0.0001127488,0.0007046971,0.007785953,0.000006191102,0.00008473133,0.00002560959,0.01305297,0.0004032197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903187,0.0002029393,0.000008714328,0.0003482192,0.00009310563,0.0005904805,0.0003455834,0.00006619565,0.008026021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990743,0.0002641314,0.00005219146,0.0003374291,0.00003219795,0.0001065734,0.0000304953,0.0000239604,0.00007873609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01858169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01826415091710348,"score_gpt":0.2339946395062004,"score_spread":0.2157304885890969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}