{"id":"W2612245049","doi":"10.1111/ecog.02869","title":"Environmental marginality and geographic range limits: a case study with <i>Arabidopsis lyrata</i> ssp. <i>lyrata</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Niche; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Ecological niche; Environmental niche modelling; Biology; Environmental change; Species distribution; Geography; Climate change; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006281482,0.0001602271,0.0002266597,0.0005668011,0.001144792,0.0007305556,0.0004078749,0.0005011965,0.0009817638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001969116,0.00009979062,0.0002678493,0.001052082,0.0009437033,0.0006591791,0.0007450915,0.0004709458,0.00008454385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000789243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003269403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02410805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05535164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997773,0.0001213174,0.000009607698,0.00003586906,0.00002272652,0.00003314139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984945,0.0009152599,0.0002955158,0.00009484257,0.00007226673,0.0001276227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003448173,0.0002857549,0.8920342,0.0001933931,0.0001244627,0.02996768,0.02448534,0.005035243,0.009637524,0.005233159,0.001154045,0.03150434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002046571,0.000233575,0.9235082,0.00007296784,0.00009515865,0.01982514,0.03246272,0.008330022,0.001707391,0.004835738,0.008851779,0.00005693503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998136,0.000188553,0.0004981093,0.0001212452,6.692666e-7,0.000004444558,0.00005394984,0.000007065969,0.000989865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988857,0.0001441105,0.0007348408,0.0000252984,0.000001741923,0.000003824298,0.00005096634,0.000005813335,0.0001476353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02410805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04793543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01826415091710348,"score_gpt":0.2339946395062004,"score_spread":0.2157304885890969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}