{"id":"W2612545723","doi":"10.18520/cs/v106/i11/1490-1499","title":"Global Research Output of Nanobiotechnology Research: a Scientometrics Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientometrics; Scopus; Index (typography); Citation impact; Nanobiotechnology; Bibliometrics; China; Library science; Regional science; Citation; Political science; Geography; Social science; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3863892,0.0002302704,0.0005831538,0.2441403,0.002162997,0.003658243,0.0188982,0.0001683301,0.0001151608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4188998,0.0001633393,0.0001488885,0.7906291,0.01133783,0.001199007,0.009233982,0.001291596,0.000869416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008330664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002007173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000202031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004127455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9220263,0.002927052,0.001687167,0.003216723,0.0666076,0.003535165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417344,0.01251065,0.0004437334,0.004226228,0.03963993,0.001445087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001860971,0.001447272,0.3266009,0.000009258584,0.00000349576,0.000003650886,0.000387664,0.00003176046,0.0009226622,0.02823926,0.005170675,0.6371648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00152835,0.003961576,0.7413724,0.00005707193,0.000006512658,0.00001495583,0.005747127,0.02172414,0.00374302,0.114594,0.1066931,0.0005577962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781824,0.001027888,0.004861598,0.0006045963,0.002401968,0.0009780593,0.0000266595,0.00005369442,0.01186316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988773,0.00008992739,0.0005052431,0.000009310007,0.00009239728,0.00003197371,6.089479e-7,0.000009138764,0.0003840731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.636607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.917201976812686,"score_gpt":0.7366759240880296,"score_spread":0.1805260527246564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}