{"id":"W2612924886","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2016-0498","title":"Using survival analysis to predict the harvesting of forest stands in Quebec, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Basal area; Statistics; Context (archaeology); Plot (graphics); Mathematics; Variable (mathematics); Contrast (vision); Forest inventory; Random forest; Forest plot; Environmental science; Forestry; Econometrics; Geography; Forest management; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002639846,0.0001043395,0.0002445742,0.0005770795,0.0006246294,0.0002537865,0.001441884,0.00004140039,0.0006194364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001094199,0.00007847698,0.00008569223,0.0009775308,0.0005100819,0.0003423601,0.0001829639,0.0003787439,0.000009140057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001160981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001844301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977161,0.0001690763,0.0003949806,0.0001503643,0.0008950796,0.000674449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983348,0.0001623813,0.000226161,0.000529253,0.0000950222,0.0006524021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001498035,0.000004909281,0.9434185,0.000006178126,0.00005918631,0.0001370992,0.0002922704,0.04863781,0.00001072547,0.0002835969,0.00631546,0.000819268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001826818,0.00004641155,0.9830294,0.00004212789,0.00003537658,0.00000276882,0.0001779654,0.002569372,0.00001402269,0.00014284,0.01367826,0.00007873101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984581,0.0000325821,0.00004560173,0.001909342,0.0001269025,0.000161448,0.00001777426,7.550174e-7,0.01312462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957884,0.000004588677,0.00009648161,0.00003575116,0.0001018794,0.000001898333,0.000001466338,0.0000106386,0.003958899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04606844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6782393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08060877626547373,"score_gpt":0.3400981978718707,"score_spread":0.2594894216063969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}