{"id":"W2612966970","doi":"10.1016/j.crma.2004.10.025","title":"Cup products in Hopf-cyclic cohomology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comptes Rendus Mathématique","topic":"Algebraic structures and combinatorial models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Hopf algebra; Cohomology; Cyclic homology; Pure mathematics; Crossed product; Product (mathematics); Cup product; Quasitriangular Hopf algebra; Field (mathematics); Algebra over a field; Geometry; De Rham cohomology; Equivariant cohomology; Division algebra; Filtered algebra","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001055609,0.0009213656,0.0005225577,0.003388592,0.002153856,0.002964375,0.0008051601,0.0008491328,0.005049708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002188135,0.0004313458,0.0009942984,0.002140407,0.003150371,0.004346008,0.002666263,0.001244338,0.0007586433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001070468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005829325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001043672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007704998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992982,0.0001272158,0.00003952087,0.0001036125,0.0002682424,0.0001631184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987521,0.0002682316,0.0001775825,0.000175823,0.000270963,0.0003551539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009628814,0.0000118789,0.0002442818,0.00003812522,0.000005203593,0.0001425839,0.0002639081,0.0003499353,0.0004584751,0.992401,0.001161203,0.004913769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008890854,0.00003582495,0.0006994556,0.00003848415,0.0000261931,0.0006095407,0.0001776393,0.006268657,0.002953382,0.9785675,0.01057199,0.00004240323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5723058,0.004678125,0.2484435,0.001415408,0.001072692,0.000180616,0.0005447141,0.0008700356,0.170489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616183,0.001177017,0.02108489,0.0002625862,0.0003842366,0.00008210531,0.0002816704,0.0001334066,0.01497574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005049708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01689297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03817177236408066,"score_gpt":0.2945854127010469,"score_spread":0.2564136403369662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}