{"id":"W2613438777","doi":"10.33697/ajur.2015.020","title":"Category Theoretic Interpretation of Rings","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Undergraduate Research","topic":"Algebraic structures and combinatorial models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"2-category; Equivalence of categories; Closed category; Mathematics; Derived category; Concrete category; Interpretation (philosophy); Enriched category; Category of groups; Category theory; Object (grammar); Equivalence (formal languages); Idempotence; Category of rings; Category of sets; Ring (chemistry); Higher category theory; Triangulated category; Pure mathematics; Biproduct; Linguistics; Commutative ring; Functor; Principal ideal ring","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002364148,0.0001011427,0.0003850222,0.0003095748,0.00004384372,0.00002958096,0.0003423241,0.00003217823,0.000007126196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001301163,0.00007556729,0.0001165035,0.0005181573,0.0006571832,0.000127709,0.00009109684,0.0004573386,0.000004227038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001308748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003846979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009160495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000288491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974505,0.0005421785,0.0005117483,0.0001107344,0.001115229,0.0002696683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969006,0.0008534928,0.0005189255,0.0002305477,0.001286165,0.000210317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003630823,0.00007034132,0.000220497,0.00003275713,0.00008897657,0.00001738558,0.001627936,0.00006329059,0.0001438039,0.9880267,0.0008798845,0.008465298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004632894,0.001396756,0.00004354053,0.00007164417,0.00002193507,0.00007821336,0.002237202,0.0003452699,0.0008740225,0.9943433,0.00005344746,0.00007135577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885882,0.0001560715,0.005620078,0.003064073,0.0002656674,0.0001040394,5.086349e-7,0.000008870162,0.002192545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983811,0.00006628389,0.001318601,0.00001702006,0.0001110375,0.000001819802,2.375634e-7,0.00002205647,0.00008177744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009793019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3081545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07587383766781959,"score_gpt":0.3919032279502485,"score_spread":0.3160293902824289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}