{"id":"W2613438777","doi":"10.33697/ajur.2015.020","title":"Category Theoretic Interpretation of Rings","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Undergraduate Research","topic":"Algebraic structures and combinatorial models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"2-category; Equivalence of categories; Closed category; Mathematics; Derived category; Concrete category; Interpretation (philosophy); Enriched category; Category of groups; Category theory; Object (grammar); Equivalence (formal languages); Idempotence; Category of rings; Category of sets; Ring (chemistry); Higher category theory; Triangulated category; Pure mathematics; Biproduct; Linguistics; Commutative ring; Functor; Principal ideal ring","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001492613,0.0005078485,0.0003580478,0.001942081,0.001336157,0.004326935,0.001078015,0.0007432519,0.008572296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001746676,0.0002596762,0.0006726938,0.0008696305,0.004222469,0.007716204,0.00305607,0.00149049,0.0007607435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001234989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005861466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004361529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004126319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985952,0.0005702904,0.00007241753,0.0003137429,0.0002800207,0.000168402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988369,0.000464607,0.0001055293,0.000204852,0.0002519605,0.0001361507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007057851,0.000005890164,0.0001422116,0.00002637403,0.000004250034,0.00004441427,0.0002822218,0.0002179141,0.0003733594,0.9962174,0.0004091685,0.002269734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007430319,0.00002661661,0.0004775336,0.00002838846,0.000009974644,0.0003433634,0.0003616583,0.001453352,0.0007804525,0.9577628,0.03873665,0.00001172881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1699928,0.007454752,0.4461074,0.005618098,0.001200594,0.00009991659,0.001193188,0.0006160366,0.3677172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221876,0.001298262,0.05412479,0.0009057943,0.000732303,0.00008660819,0.0003661862,0.00008844787,0.02021011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008572296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02867723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07587383766781959,"score_gpt":0.3919032279502485,"score_spread":0.3160293902824289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}