{"id":"W2613500262","doi":"10.1109/irc.2017.74","title":"Sliding Local Planners for Sampling-Based Path Planning","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Victoria; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Workspace; Motion planning; Planner; Benchmark (surveying); Path (computing); Computer science; Sampling (signal processing); Robot; Boundary (topology); Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Computer vision","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005019339,0.0001739674,0.0002021241,0.00008461631,0.0008494575,0.0005805705,0.001687835,0.0000865868,0.000003026145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002497375,0.0001560549,0.0000822869,0.00005147142,0.00005406685,0.0004323996,0.0001925073,0.0001256987,0.00002702337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004922286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001109264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003683074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.367654e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985736,0.00001925598,0.0002076923,0.0004735461,0.0002436148,0.0004822732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982713,0.0003286202,0.0001784719,0.001010391,0.00006497969,0.00014625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007855738,0.0001552946,0.01459092,0.0001414361,0.0001003858,0.0002873813,0.001551775,0.7644384,0.0006457944,0.09298023,0.01997171,0.1050581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006238664,0.00009978192,0.002599553,0.00009266025,0.00000526072,0.000009796514,0.00004360092,0.9920923,0.0009865279,0.00104317,0.002149569,0.0002539703],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001033486,0.00002664072,0.9945719,0.0009216036,0.0008617114,0.0001854517,0.00000545897,0.0003087996,0.002084896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3858757,1.780689e-7,0.61349,0.0003215508,0.0001048385,0.0000220325,0.000005677848,0.0000118185,0.0001681787],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3848422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6533427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09831942216085099,"score_gpt":0.3508832476118815,"score_spread":0.2525638254510305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}