{"id":"W2613621158","doi":"","title":"The Unbearable Lightness of Balancing: Towards a Theoretical Framework for the Doctrinal Complexity in Proportionality Analysis in Constitutional Adjudication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Writ; Charter; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0159818,0.0007636812,0.0008058421,0.003391965,0.009890034,0.01651237,0.003632188,0.00598779,0.005243294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01800071,0.0006401089,0.001088222,0.002524308,0.07934969,0.01899083,0.007359466,0.01149533,0.0007946001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01294212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009318206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01700341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01760998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9843717,0.01050076,0.0003183657,0.001281354,0.002524449,0.001003393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906538,0.006480628,0.000732851,0.0007895069,0.001007303,0.000335748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001392613,0.000001885288,0.00002185922,0.000003023151,4.185289e-7,0.000007165842,0.0006511116,0.00008092453,0.00001457213,0.9985103,0.000193037,0.0005143126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006038872,0.000005281523,0.00006372554,0.00003200094,0.000002389626,0.00001212784,0.0006650002,0.001004613,0.00006374619,0.9874082,0.01072962,0.000007238365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03663003,0.004437333,0.4423386,0.09113562,0.001070101,0.0002020934,0.0001284405,0.0001541399,0.4239037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105321,0.001826172,0.05886016,0.006500651,0.00119559,0.000380617,0.0000711373,0.0001647771,0.02046874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01700341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09390211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03172615101226275,"score_gpt":0.3366598236446587,"score_spread":0.3049336726323959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}