{"id":"W2613744342","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2017-0088","title":"Uncertainty of inventory-based estimates of the carbon dynamics of Canada’s managed forest (1990–2014)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Biome; Environmental science; Greenhouse gas; Forest inventory; Carbon accounting; Forest ecology; Stock (firearms); Biomass (ecology); Carbon stock; Taiga; Atmospheric sciences; Ecosystem; Forest dynamics; Climate change; Forestry; Forest management; Ecology; Agroforestry; Geography; Physics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009798309,0.0005827498,0.0003934085,0.001776245,0.001103405,0.002971534,0.00124939,0.0004160515,0.0005156553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02308005,0.0005018445,0.0008163572,0.00255263,0.001248696,0.00133303,0.0008378198,0.0007870882,0.00008185631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02790569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01762149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.938156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9232068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971065,0.0005988563,0.0001997053,0.000504169,0.001256714,0.0003339924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877748,0.005415497,0.001368402,0.0008927389,0.004299629,0.0002488623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003771369,0.00007259351,0.3860824,0.0001690677,0.0008613933,0.0001475185,0.0006755524,0.5692706,0.00120882,0.009413859,0.003776458,0.02794452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006652856,0.00007842202,0.332549,0.0003258973,0.0003474945,0.0001600699,0.0008640128,0.6382201,0.004382734,0.01099099,0.01177459,0.0002402082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9569663,0.001710382,0.02253612,0.000654719,0.00003913943,0.0001146974,0.007792957,0.0003046969,0.009880928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911213,0.0003148212,0.005094894,0.00009180413,0.000006147121,0.00001959571,0.002977136,0.00002602708,0.0003482145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06184399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2024709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02202052075927662,"score_gpt":0.2683417832180836,"score_spread":0.2463212624588069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}