{"id":"W2613928787","doi":"10.7939/r3rv0dc3n","title":"Matching goals and outcomes of park interpretation using the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A case study of Alberta's Provincial Parks","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Theory of planned behavior; Matching (statistics); Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Regional science; Computer science; Statistics; Environmental science; Mathematics; Control (management); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003066455,0.0001858215,0.0002260271,0.0008645316,0.003290972,0.003355569,0.001234046,0.001124746,0.002223694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01382741,0.0002023715,0.000265137,0.001827116,0.002229513,0.001332106,0.001147302,0.0007339651,0.0001124834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00954913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01132068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5786877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.820271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976836,0.001333381,0.00004621143,0.0001338592,0.0003539082,0.0004489387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949926,0.003187722,0.0004195539,0.0003603174,0.000641068,0.0003987893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009767519,0.001336062,0.6059383,0.0001515229,0.0001293198,0.005938297,0.1357787,0.03931694,0.002030371,0.07270971,0.004139502,0.1315545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001546674,0.0003904669,0.551252,0.0001637777,0.0001349212,0.0009850336,0.3014016,0.08006014,0.001990948,0.05106202,0.01229891,0.0001054663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879525,0.00002711935,0.001418359,0.0002697168,0.000002067333,0.00005392262,0.00003728534,0.000008757961,0.01023013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997893,0.00001272058,0.001358483,0.000007955359,3.841548e-7,0.000009197961,0.00001707167,0.000003724174,0.0006975922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5786877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.847587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02669311297851932,"score_gpt":0.1920745928958498,"score_spread":0.1653814799173305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}