{"id":"W2614263794","doi":"10.1108/qae-11-2016-0061","title":"Aligning accreditation and academic program reviews: a Canadian case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Originality; Process (computing); Quality assurance; Medical education; Resource (disambiguation); Value (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Qualitative research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01352636,0.00007840007,0.0001455422,0.000116357,0.001507114,0.0003615038,0.0002406534,0.00009175646,0.00001772739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01532328,0.00008738572,0.00001714906,0.0001167772,0.0001208279,0.001659166,0.00001609581,0.0002777099,0.00001733333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003104806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00167741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8450977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9185691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968755,0.002020744,0.0003687487,0.0002489706,0.0002852866,0.0002007249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984347,0.0004252266,0.0005548231,0.0003048301,0.0001379152,0.0001425371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021501,0.0001445465,0.5622715,0.00002455799,0.000003651554,0.000005169266,0.09949292,0.000001814369,0.000004525356,0.001246316,0.0006652048,0.3361376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001913949,0.00003395713,0.781541,0.0001228139,0.00001877362,0.00001036361,0.1514015,0.00003000111,0.000001417957,0.001091476,0.06541233,0.0001450136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749715,0.000617994,0.000006934889,0.01814876,0.0007990519,0.001480907,0.000001516531,0.00003284669,0.003940478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969047,0.0003384208,0.001697438,0.0001700859,0.0003085424,0.0003516316,0.000004287705,0.000005672024,0.0002191777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3359926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3785250918363774,"score_gpt":0.6180966053799812,"score_spread":0.2395715135436038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}