{"id":"W2614742532","doi":"10.1111/jbi.13022","title":"A test of the habitat amount hypothesis as an explanation for the species richness of forest bird assemblages","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biogeography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Species richness; Ecology; Geography; Deciduous; Spatial heterogeneity; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003152277,0.0004224768,0.0003697294,0.0007711084,0.0006106811,0.00125511,0.001341652,0.0007613269,0.00781526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01149459,0.0002493792,0.0007299661,0.0005403581,0.001961663,0.000950614,0.000777642,0.0005377867,0.00041784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009936335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001050733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03988009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02896434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983931,0.0006687343,0.00009509867,0.0004052428,0.0002651278,0.0001725871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868886,0.007819542,0.002363214,0.001071551,0.001082905,0.0007741501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001790756,0.00003512932,0.9903585,0.00004971985,0.0002616722,0.0001525986,0.0001794146,0.0008518095,0.0006052078,0.001147042,0.0004704202,0.005709234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053173,0.0001656682,0.9838696,0.00003275187,0.000101572,0.0002691326,0.0009281844,0.00999898,0.0003508207,0.003523409,0.0006930977,0.0000135633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846295,0.0005193565,0.008079506,0.001504953,0.00006888087,0.00003524047,0.0004904603,0.0000679771,0.004604165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991722,0.00001952131,0.0003897013,0.00007262139,0.00002123748,0.000007721794,0.00008510616,0.000004658675,0.0002272621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03988009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07929593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01747559349689476,"score_gpt":0.2479860765646993,"score_spread":0.2305104830678046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}