{"id":"W2614742532","doi":"10.1111/jbi.13022","title":"A test of the habitat amount hypothesis as an explanation for the species richness of forest bird assemblages","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biogeography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Species richness; Ecology; Geography; Deciduous; Spatial heterogeneity; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005127311,0.00007079541,0.0001492424,0.00006899804,0.0004585081,0.00002479575,0.0005208554,0.00004055497,0.00002097256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004972263,0.00003669458,0.0002024837,0.0001145618,0.0006302886,0.0002271414,0.00007295685,0.00006278521,0.000001553891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001332363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008780834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007558683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003108195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993276,0.00003294173,0.0002693078,0.00007003489,0.0002069616,0.00009317758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981403,0.0006235027,0.0009111635,0.0002302573,0.00007282785,0.00002189382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002498491,0.0001001464,0.9952317,0.000007988547,0.00006118973,3.980373e-7,0.0002030127,0.0001367224,0.003141636,0.0005164199,0.0001987374,0.0003770623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002314119,0.0002533087,0.9892602,0.00001757058,0.00007522349,0.000005209788,0.0004469412,0.0001165883,0.002191784,0.007116595,0.0002415239,0.00004362189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972471,0.0000981109,0.0002295292,0.001550172,0.0001866905,0.0001375187,0.00001545658,0.000002522835,0.0005329186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992849,0.0001855267,0.0003943704,0.00005303249,0.00003249779,0.000008465884,2.063557e-7,0.000005546287,0.00003550775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006600175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.352652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01747559349689476,"score_gpt":0.2479860765646993,"score_spread":0.2305104830678046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}