{"id":"W2615444200","doi":"10.1109/sips.2017.8109987","title":"Efficient bit-channel reliability computation for multi-mode polar code encoders and decoders","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Error Correcting Code Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Encoder; Polar code; Reliability (semiconductor); Algorithm; Computation; Code (set theory); Channel (broadcasting); Low-density parity-check code; Decoding methods; Code rate; Parity bit; Computer engineering; Error detection and correction; Set (abstract data type); Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003934025,0.0004047476,0.0004234546,0.0004516991,0.0002616212,0.0006779068,0.0006367887,0.0003176132,0.001994157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001833606,0.0002071498,0.0002645005,0.000330143,0.0003043352,0.0008548957,0.0004571821,0.0004240783,0.000582566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005822226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009381097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001775854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002743574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996954,0.00007046827,0.00001696278,0.0000415332,0.0001358653,0.00003986073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992391,0.000291679,0.0000708361,0.0001696692,0.000208802,0.00001987067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004402856,0.0000476774,0.001647198,0.0002217917,0.00004581122,0.0001834286,0.0001982886,0.7238045,0.05457677,0.02969868,0.001670771,0.1874647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006139823,0.00002457623,0.00011873,0.000006693072,0.000005768842,0.00004203365,0.00001068214,0.9848934,0.01181655,0.002533178,0.0005371432,0.000005209498],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05750448,0.0002197144,0.9388772,0.00006673324,0.00002144033,0.00002473403,0.00007531681,0.00119724,0.002013157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7648652,0.0001690879,0.232886,0.00003358671,0.00001513226,0.0000567325,0.0001332238,0.000101242,0.00173988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001994157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006671131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06047249763726605,"score_gpt":0.3589647498871124,"score_spread":0.2984922522498464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}