{"id":"W2615685602","doi":"10.1017/s0266462317000307","title":"EVALUATION CRITERIA OF PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN RESOURCE ALLOCATION DECISIONS: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND QUALITATIVE STUDY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Stakeholder; Resource allocation; Legitimacy; Thematic analysis; Resource (disambiguation); Public health; Qualitative research; Health care; Patient participation; Public relations; Public participation; Psychology; Medicine; Management science; Business; Nursing; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.181675,0.001003318,0.002828964,0.02707472,0.003909985,0.005643982,0.002490535,0.002187427,0.001879218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1726026,0.001080497,0.002082448,0.0292415,0.004557602,0.007914537,0.005691644,0.001681722,0.0002581149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01613165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04790608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00738251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01738155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8401876,0.1154636,0.02528173,0.002380291,0.01422841,0.002458387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7155476,0.231993,0.0156946,0.003223863,0.03218349,0.001357461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002915587,0.0002032864,0.01105246,0.2498164,0.0007525284,0.002241507,0.3124516,0.0006138409,0.001889373,0.02215239,0.007972614,0.3905625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001158045,0.0003259567,0.009193982,0.3970177,0.001817294,0.00181948,0.4616061,0.0006554713,0.002695941,0.006455474,0.1180802,0.0002165565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1986575,0.6470736,0.05374367,0.03417663,0.00135512,0.02916612,0.002730944,0.0001254448,0.03297105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6234432,0.2712306,0.06582882,0.005548758,0.0002036791,0.03136714,0.0008354593,0.00007228136,0.001469913],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.181675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9608006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3797926728429359,"score_gpt":0.6310508263209478,"score_spread":0.2512581534780119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}