{"id":"W2615864160","doi":"10.1109/tmag.2017.2750901","title":"A Benchmark TEAM Problem for Multi-Objective Pareto Optimization of Electromagnetic Devices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","topic":"Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Multi-objective optimization; Mathematical optimization; Pareto principle; Finite element method; Field (mathematics); Sensitivity (control systems); Mathematics; Machine learning; Electronic engineering; Physics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003039586,0.001248574,0.00123962,0.001250271,0.0009153921,0.0018772,0.001236567,0.001635593,0.003092769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006437919,0.0002986786,0.0009883497,0.001018708,0.0008684832,0.00118892,0.001608986,0.001362532,0.0004994598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001203788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001146404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001309867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001031866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984862,0.0007555052,0.00005773896,0.0001346147,0.0004399322,0.000126042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981878,0.001002309,0.0001384932,0.0001726037,0.0003530533,0.0001457217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006187802,0.00005779696,0.0003854518,0.0001054902,0.000037874,0.00004586991,0.00002711295,0.9039162,0.001023435,0.06364463,0.002416133,0.02827812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001209146,0.00007122026,0.0001410554,0.00002580372,0.000007350357,0.00002840987,0.00001958238,0.9716386,0.0009073265,0.02422517,0.002913112,0.00001036806],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01433533,0.0003397429,0.9711075,0.0002449477,0.0001158269,0.00009170947,0.0001897917,0.0001029836,0.01347226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4861683,0.0006855605,0.5029708,0.0001885541,0.0001091594,0.0007034994,0.0009018946,0.0002452899,0.008026963],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003092769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01607507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02289956013902422,"score_gpt":0.2879423914286392,"score_spread":0.265042831289615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}