{"id":"W2616323264","doi":"10.3138/topia.37.137","title":"Lez Play! An Aesthetic Discourse Analysis of Allyson Mitchell’s <i>Ladies Sasquatch</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Public Spaces through Art","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Aesthetics; Queer; Mainstream; Sculpture; Feeling; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Resistance (ecology); Mythology; Aesthetic experience; Power (physics); Art; Gender studies; Psychology; Visual arts; Literature; Social psychology; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008990366,0.0001736649,0.0006877572,0.0002537779,0.001702211,0.0002996752,0.0009417858,0.00007921477,0.0001223564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007479065,0.000127329,0.0003177188,0.0002975362,0.001720866,0.001275723,0.00003986515,0.0001784048,0.000005689136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002878938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007391489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.140781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9115375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982375,0.0001728725,0.0004521876,0.0001647962,0.0004885611,0.0004840684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997462,0.00005737383,0.0007866756,0.0003296847,0.0007820258,0.0005822788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005187955,0.00009141744,0.3135734,0.00002759446,0.005872549,0.0002166452,0.5927477,0.0003726084,0.0001359333,0.03603536,0.03629095,0.0145839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008758426,0.000417838,0.2175616,0.0001867871,0.002853891,0.00002633577,0.4074685,0.00002542752,0.0001606481,0.00204641,0.3677033,0.0006734013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632561,0.00284123,0.000003990058,0.02164449,0.0005070365,0.00009331037,0.00002009135,0.000007935709,0.01162583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952517,0.0008538985,0.0002135221,0.0001649649,0.0002949224,0.000002275756,0.000001926153,0.000007608589,0.003209242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7707564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08175861423502631,"score_gpt":0.4117849200553653,"score_spread":0.330026305820339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}