{"id":"W2616838035","doi":"10.1007/s10287-017-0279-4","title":"Quality evaluation of scenario-tree generation methods for solving stochastic programming problems","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Management Science","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Stochastic programming; Tree (set theory); Extension (predicate logic); Quality (philosophy); Focus (optics); Decision maker; Decision tree; Mathematics; Operations research; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02504853,0.001019182,0.001285222,0.002601448,0.0005579814,0.001867211,0.001747425,0.002571993,0.002732269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06383198,0.0005019418,0.001211002,0.001553213,0.0008188865,0.001864315,0.001579203,0.001549451,0.0003215221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001522636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001693749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002898583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002463533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923816,0.00539355,0.0003482409,0.0003275744,0.001345823,0.0002031998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.925169,0.06205721,0.002113963,0.00350329,0.00625414,0.0009023069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006850401,0.0001556605,0.004446263,0.0002588622,0.0001729286,0.00003714129,0.00007837021,0.9226469,0.0005094108,0.008655797,0.001254699,0.06109881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004375642,0.00009447311,0.000385545,0.00002780828,0.0000244547,0.00001506238,0.00001245724,0.9960678,0.0003126067,0.002811205,0.0001992128,0.000005602455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2069612,0.003457587,0.7814379,0.0009908275,0.0002461858,0.0003738808,0.0006565056,0.0009576718,0.004918315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7656399,0.0007080453,0.231134,0.0001890925,0.00007864882,0.0002296585,0.001036373,0.0003250686,0.0006592474],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02504853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1324709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.382108710654722,"score_gpt":0.5502521118101507,"score_spread":0.1681434011554286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}