{"id":"W2617104875","doi":"10.3968/9547","title":"A Discussion on the Safety of Urban and Rural Ecological Public Products","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Regional Development and Environment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Context (archaeology); Ecological crisis; Sustainable development; Perspective (graphical); Process (computing); Production (economics); Ecology; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Epistemology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001111461,0.00004782596,0.00006338237,0.00003631115,0.005530944,0.0001846849,0.0005754816,0.0000397036,0.00006741256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006602967,0.00002556802,0.00001625733,0.0001419592,0.003859034,0.0002303418,0.00006629822,0.00006248049,0.000009885035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003046451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007585432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005855626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990488,0.00004981911,0.0000702695,0.000144522,0.0003752206,0.0003113591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995167,0.00002594306,0.00006630636,0.0001234772,0.00003281178,0.0002347894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004352092,0.00001552935,0.128709,0.000001486779,0.000002839426,0.000002271444,0.008512544,6.971609e-8,0.0001433077,0.8432363,0.005334909,0.01403736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003991394,0.00001085028,0.8088237,0.000004893146,0.000001103716,8.16429e-8,0.00380132,0.000001667798,0.00001425686,0.001438863,0.1858047,0.00005866775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5125762,0.000008229647,4.518662e-7,0.1654789,0.0002173753,0.00019623,0.000004862989,0.000005347585,0.3215125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981647,0.00001794946,0.00001156314,0.0003251198,0.0001293518,0.000005063931,5.455024e-7,0.000001534335,0.001344145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8417975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03639223409812548,"score_gpt":0.2608120790838048,"score_spread":0.2244198449856794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}