{"id":"W2617662142","doi":"10.1080/14649357.2015.1131482","title":"Exploring the winners and losers of marine environmental governance/Marine spatial planning:<i>Cui bono</i>?/“More than fishy business”: epistemology, integration and conflict in marine spatial planning/Marine spatial planning: power and scaping/Surely not all planning is evil?/Marine spatial planning: a Canadian perspective/Maritime spatial planning – “<i>ad utilitatem omnium</i>”/Marine spatial planning: “it is better to be on the train than being hit by it”/Reflections from the perspective of recreational anglers and boats for hire/Maritime spatial planning and marine renewable energy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory & Practice","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Marine spatial planning; Corporate governance; Spatial planning; Power (physics); Environmental governance; Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0112154,0.0004038733,0.000495267,0.001775227,0.01275473,0.02184002,0.00209306,0.003899893,0.004068534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007893474,0.0004044431,0.0005540105,0.003194889,0.06982452,0.02040914,0.0119094,0.006934434,0.0002517375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02698469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02320942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1506073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2848153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919437,0.004815128,0.0001211855,0.0004825043,0.0009981958,0.001639368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956955,0.002196751,0.0003719375,0.0003015322,0.0005030422,0.000931189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001183205,0.00001451506,0.001584987,0.00009952577,0.00001767582,0.0001707937,0.1151122,0.0004636993,0.0001126081,0.8549438,0.01111945,0.01634888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006873444,0.00001657893,0.004988099,0.0005362527,0.00001579726,0.00009354362,0.4174277,0.0006495704,0.0001806955,0.3912061,0.1848479,0.00003087051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1536877,0.02334574,0.01424205,0.4925035,0.001286351,0.00007303622,0.00008505177,0.00004666816,0.3147299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748707,0.007534998,0.001994146,0.007726963,0.0001638077,0.00003628443,0.0000328906,0.00005050486,0.007589729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8493927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2994613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04117619622514487,"score_gpt":0.2697325429607808,"score_spread":0.2285563467356359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}