{"id":"W2618788640","doi":"10.5539/apr.v9n3p31","title":"An Elucidation of the Symmetry of Length Contraction Predicted by the Special Theory of Relativity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Physics Research","topic":"Relativity and Gravitational Theory","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inertial frame of reference; Physics; Contraction (grammar); Length contraction; Classical mechanics; Reference frame; Fictitious force; Theory of relativity; One-way speed of light; Twin paradox; Mechanics; Time dilation; Frame (networking); Computer science; Principle of relativity","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003235594,0.0005020016,0.000625456,0.0007978213,0.001035735,0.001306792,0.001015087,0.0009280956,0.002768258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004297651,0.000272763,0.001096962,0.0005218081,0.007140392,0.006084012,0.001821385,0.002002613,0.0006108141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008989773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009997208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007797788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003152992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998675,0.0004795041,0.000102735,0.0003087379,0.0003124839,0.0001213987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998036,0.0005402301,0.0003553821,0.0006793533,0.0003085577,0.00008056359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008082837,0.000003075216,0.0001730303,0.00001926055,0.000002994952,0.00005867229,0.0002040481,0.0004581258,0.0003581387,0.9949542,0.0004121092,0.003348231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009497597,0.00005785974,0.0004700235,0.00001499206,0.000006219512,0.0002268688,0.00008285868,0.004485834,0.0004052888,0.9851657,0.009059893,0.00001489102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1157855,0.002945501,0.7202086,0.009606201,0.00263648,0.00009529827,0.0002353007,0.0004062087,0.1480808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.874032,0.001775795,0.1104039,0.001415068,0.001399321,0.0001267088,0.0002063536,0.0001266932,0.01051407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003235594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01711166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04354542382903403,"score_gpt":0.3558357913945074,"score_spread":0.3122903675654733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}