{"id":"W2619091358","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.016","title":"Designing feedback to mitigate teen distracted driving: A social norms approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"AUTO21 Network of Centres of Excellence; Toyota Collaborative Safety Research Center","keywords":"Distracted driving; Poison control; Injury prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Occupational safety and health; Psychology; Safe driving; Computer security; Distraction; Aeronautics; Engineering; Applied psychology; Simulation; Computer science; Medical emergency; Cognitive psychology; Medicine; Automotive engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0164941,0.001196975,0.0003807913,0.001633215,0.002405901,0.003311459,0.001887808,0.001347842,0.003607024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06243449,0.0004313347,0.0004367703,0.0004638899,0.002183704,0.003735035,0.002476231,0.001859001,0.0005357654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001682908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005061703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004443325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9840628,0.01047483,0.0005478024,0.001017839,0.003334231,0.0005624401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9180456,0.0560322,0.004509142,0.003393571,0.01537345,0.002646022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001031419,0.008710387,0.04096922,0.002006467,0.0002300879,0.0007075776,0.1172417,0.01328815,0.04243713,0.05262899,0.0105068,0.7102422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001178533,0.01189747,0.0493982,0.003501885,0.001170019,0.001135124,0.216671,0.2498614,0.1176514,0.197891,0.1490161,0.0006280777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2696396,0.0002488807,0.6591918,0.008447004,0.0003850666,0.002249852,0.000110038,0.002556451,0.05717134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8004229,0.0001495971,0.193953,0.0006495143,0.00007813108,0.001188282,0.0000572056,0.0001480768,0.003353256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0164941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08723015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01578254728991245,"score_gpt":0.2625883276521866,"score_spread":0.2468057803622741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}