{"id":"W2619890971","doi":"10.7717/peerj.3294","title":"Assessing the utility of an institutional publications officer: a pilot assessment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Publishing; Outreach; Publication; Perception; Psychology; Medical education; Citation; Library science; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05481616,0.0006045823,0.00067905,0.001786293,0.002016899,0.002880715,0.002178973,0.001201424,0.003967724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08285963,0.0007304303,0.0010438,0.001227911,0.001639142,0.002433071,0.003443542,0.001808889,0.001262526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002441095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008028379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001570849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00314517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9715347,0.01713001,0.002713271,0.001221203,0.00537426,0.002026568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8175179,0.07545145,0.02915602,0.01057584,0.04417546,0.02312322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003305723,0.02348724,0.6364218,0.002109727,0.000193635,0.001061769,0.03318765,0.0007508527,0.008644454,0.0008584739,0.005134945,0.2848439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008019992,0.0447158,0.8826458,0.0005256979,0.0002909659,0.0005025321,0.03518305,0.002820051,0.007310934,0.0003719488,0.02463478,0.0001965783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989525,0.0001206514,0.002217576,0.0005262268,0.0000560916,0.00386646,0.0002057718,0.0001308879,0.003351311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672628,0.0003672374,0.02281393,0.0003938305,0.0001278771,0.006326363,0.0003794683,0.00004043287,0.002288072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.289899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1802160072952926,"score_gpt":0.3859009702846602,"score_spread":0.2056849629893677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}