{"id":"W2620357847","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12945","title":"Impacts of salvage logging on biodiversity: A meta‐analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":385,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Université Laval; Royal Alberta Museum; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Logging; Biodiversity; Salvage logging; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Ecosystem; Biology; Forest ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01411656,0.003277466,0.008859012,0.004403567,0.0008766335,0.002950153,0.002786061,0.002133421,0.00680739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02336752,0.00129035,0.04332757,0.005776575,0.0007304553,0.001550417,0.001900943,0.002710442,0.0005381279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001196515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00202481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007122097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009395244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881138,0.007456024,0.001428305,0.001975063,0.0005979194,0.0004287841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801558,0.01572798,0.001512778,0.001390021,0.0007550598,0.0004583888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002469089,0.00005996606,0.02213956,0.02096624,0.9446763,0.0002454387,0.00005537656,0.002612638,0.0005412145,0.0001471765,0.000870025,0.005217012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003785696,0.0003200582,0.01355152,0.001513572,0.9801271,0.0001239916,0.00006893201,0.002028632,0.0002583791,0.0004292838,0.001162732,0.00003722392],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.220354,0.7274715,0.02614267,0.002959599,0.00196175,0.0006998462,0.017558,0.0008349401,0.002017807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523333,0.03682232,0.005689527,0.0006985688,0.000255795,0.0006263301,0.00286512,0.0001409026,0.0005682568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07465637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02659221893901622,"score_gpt":0.2641752097883129,"score_spread":0.2375829908492967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}