{"id":"W2620418319","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2017.1327985","title":"Examining occupational health and safety vulnerability among Canadian workers with disabilities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability and Rehabilitation","topic":"Disability Education and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health; McMaster University; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Seneca Polytechnic","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Occupational safety and health; Vulnerability (computing); Hazard; Environmental health; Work (physics); Medicine; Psychology; Gerontology; Computer security; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003519971,0.0001923939,0.0002853136,0.00005102307,0.004748131,0.0004355263,0.0002048821,0.0001636214,0.0001803356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005986887,0.0001714465,0.00004882671,0.0001064131,0.01117177,0.0009516192,0.00005672275,0.0002390731,0.000004193961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008437089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001050742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4497645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7546895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973932,0.0006490811,0.0004198029,0.0006391503,0.000377246,0.0005215307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965698,0.001564348,0.0001745273,0.0006649442,0.0001619976,0.0008644013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009751719,0.0001300944,0.9166206,0.0001111283,0.00001102128,5.096906e-8,0.05777202,0.000007218015,1.887904e-7,0.01079024,0.0001664431,0.01429352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003034641,0.0001878396,0.8462211,0.00006654937,0.000007238422,3.181254e-7,0.1459337,0.00001879586,2.156104e-7,0.003475829,0.003607202,0.0001778078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9486284,0.00005145244,0.00002974986,0.04483702,0.0002332535,0.0009417266,0.0000381662,0.00005702854,0.005183178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982733,0.0000280551,0.0008990088,0.0002323415,0.0001010726,0.0001098582,0.00003790651,0.00001173328,0.0003067648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3049251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05664859076016835,"score_gpt":0.3588474812741818,"score_spread":0.3021988905140134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}