{"id":"W2620485865","doi":"10.1080/09515089.2017.1330950","title":"A dual systems theory of incontinent action","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Anne Tanenbaum Centre for Jewish Studies, University of Toronto","keywords":"Action (physics); Epistemology; Dual (grammatical number); Action theory (sociology); Constructivism (international relations); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Focus (optics); Logical framework; Logical conjunction; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001672282,0.000379909,0.0003406671,0.0008342739,0.001190978,0.002342443,0.000875796,0.001092098,0.004836694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001810779,0.0002420634,0.0008792631,0.0003872474,0.007440723,0.002827369,0.00219467,0.001713673,0.0004063478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003326229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001737009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002087343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001444355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988301,0.000499928,0.00005682928,0.0002177729,0.0002863062,0.0001090356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999178,0.0003692849,0.00009165334,0.0001001002,0.0001558209,0.0001051703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000362074,0.000005056889,0.0001421188,0.00001278609,0.000004407896,0.00002796273,0.0003259475,0.000708827,0.0001167839,0.9967697,0.0002965715,0.001586337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001044971,0.00001278798,0.0001657041,0.00001080215,0.000005306091,0.00005622103,0.0001252835,0.004723864,0.00008885467,0.9899014,0.00489282,0.00000658098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06014868,0.001992323,0.6218954,0.01661643,0.0003002975,0.0001288792,0.0001629514,0.0002095844,0.2985454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293415,0.0005838779,0.05658869,0.0006679526,0.0001027491,0.0001334558,0.00005839784,0.00003278153,0.0124907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004836694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02413356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2224755158535307,"score_gpt":0.3991244357498587,"score_spread":0.176648919896328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}