{"id":"W2620749704","doi":"10.1111/eva.12496","title":"A critical assessment of estimating census population size from genetic population size (or vice versa) in three fishes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolutionary Applications","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Population; Census; Statistics; Variable (mathematics); Population size; Mark and recapture; Effective population size; Ecology; Estimation; Variation (astronomy); Demography; Genetic variation; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007260361,0.0004777051,0.0003205329,0.000830638,0.0005153752,0.0007954736,0.0006966016,0.0005080318,0.0005930094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01547491,0.0003351625,0.0009747164,0.0006264974,0.0006825868,0.0006676608,0.0008694499,0.0004968428,0.00008605742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001732673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009895217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02101844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04239161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984596,0.0008383702,0.000107154,0.0002921305,0.0002536319,0.00004914863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882632,0.008475999,0.001208054,0.000738045,0.001161442,0.0001532533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007298114,0.00006146393,0.7999227,0.0002640267,0.0006031235,0.0002260382,0.0008408984,0.1115183,0.03616019,0.002485794,0.0002664647,0.04692122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002458186,0.0005041262,0.6645776,0.00008263294,0.0003030155,0.000220121,0.000708028,0.3145316,0.01378832,0.003353889,0.001788771,0.0001172378],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763484,0.0002160592,0.02208243,0.0000879803,0.000007070876,0.00003090087,0.0003024714,0.00006426098,0.0008603348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857324,0.000033784,0.01393859,0.00001647973,0.000001526611,0.00002503009,0.0001415359,0.0000164966,0.00009419135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02101844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04179221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01833665688847582,"score_gpt":0.3070188695894797,"score_spread":0.2886822127010039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}