{"id":"W2620887081","doi":"10.26686/ajl.v14i1.4026","title":"Resolving Quine's Confict: A Neo-Quinean View of the Rational Revisability of Logic","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australasian Journal of Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quine; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Exegesis; Subject (documents); Computer science; Theology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001301474,0.0001221135,0.0003388168,0.00004991712,0.0007336647,0.00009580335,0.001252248,0.00003019873,0.000911503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003051712,0.00005981359,0.0002749886,0.00003084464,0.002495817,0.0002840624,0.00007812925,0.0002794254,0.000007617176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003748578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001396536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004605468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001117903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998551,0.0001685101,0.000619408,0.0001073361,0.0003877485,0.0001659875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976559,0.000101413,0.001300541,0.0005664862,0.0003191002,0.00005656276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001204622,0.0002312587,0.003203071,0.0001832354,0.00008298596,0.00001249746,0.01844545,0.00007560987,0.002317928,0.9686552,0.00518432,0.00148795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002426166,0.002480231,0.1541103,0.001748765,0.0005865936,0.0004133215,0.01088875,0.0001080507,0.001555722,0.5782048,0.2467319,0.000745452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6741285,0.002096119,0.00004328651,0.0337052,0.002782007,0.00052014,0.00005298058,0.00001638394,0.2866553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977295,0.00004004556,0.00006027035,0.0001845661,0.0006584994,9.183383e-7,3.622488e-7,0.0000052828,0.001320572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3904505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09137614410707275,"score_gpt":0.2870633837069518,"score_spread":0.1956872395998791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}