{"id":"W2620887081","doi":"10.26686/ajl.v14i1.4026","title":"Resolving Quine's Confict: A Neo-Quinean View of the Rational Revisability of Logic","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australasian Journal of Logic","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quine; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Exegesis; Subject (documents); Computer science; Theology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02143482,0.0004771047,0.000965399,0.001725848,0.005539789,0.009949885,0.002546789,0.006515242,0.002649852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03011011,0.0005948554,0.001010576,0.001053545,0.06261829,0.01841808,0.005894546,0.01069764,0.0005919272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006508662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003604365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005183422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002745695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850948,0.00890633,0.0005840944,0.001968821,0.002603163,0.0008428034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772139,0.01412185,0.001290929,0.004192118,0.002565964,0.0006152582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001197624,0.000004504989,0.00005945001,0.00001486824,0.000004992098,0.00004748573,0.002647616,0.0002471338,0.00005068031,0.9933756,0.001741755,0.001793843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009731582,0.000004467846,0.00004930952,0.00002510863,0.00000209273,0.00002652652,0.0003890132,0.0006290168,0.00007291042,0.9889649,0.009818058,0.000008788869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05449293,0.01080793,0.2186492,0.4330822,0.001724266,0.00008380118,0.0001556874,0.0003151647,0.2806888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450218,0.00145868,0.02118144,0.0178948,0.001126294,0.0001250517,0.00003772453,0.0001854509,0.01296868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02143482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1133596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09137614410707275,"score_gpt":0.2870633837069518,"score_spread":0.1956872395998791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}