{"id":"W2621147310","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.016","title":"A systematic survey of the methods literature on the reporting quality and optimal methods of handling participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Missing data; Ranking (information retrieval); Imputation (statistics); Randomized controlled trial; Data quality; Statistics; Type I and type II errors; Data collection; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Medicine; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Machine learning; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8710616,0.0006082608,0.1034146,0.0002069196,0.00009859355,0.00004392958,0.001651777,0.000927988,0.000002414012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9938418,0.0001944715,0.005135654,0.0001530807,0.0008856465,0.0001275021,0.0003717663,0.00214391,2.852007e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003745743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006321124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003641266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002032524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2948722,0.5854045,0.1174778,0.0008937427,0.0005952978,0.0007565026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.01305743,0.7838216,0.2000041,0.002064429,0.0009392761,0.0001132337],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1434464,0.001232317,0.02146138,0.4088473,0.03994421,0.00004895026,0.0005972495,0.00004431949,0.000005753704,0.03409563,0.000118596,0.3501579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1309072,0.00123592,0.001452265,0.6181777,0.03741901,0.0002459508,0.0001284913,0.002917688,0.000009837252,0.2061616,0.0004994708,0.0008448384],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003398626,0.5540548,0.4376925,0.0006074865,0.0004616387,0.006731784,0.00009425921,0.000008928881,0.000008750528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003503986,0.3144193,0.684733,0.0001138697,0.00009800868,0.0002102922,0.00000589208,0.00004335192,0.00002591064],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3493131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.931434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.968639756689589,"score_gpt":0.7980095567593587,"score_spread":0.1706301999302303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}