{"id":"W2621209496","doi":"10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.870","title":"Carbon Footprint of Copying Paper: Considering Temporary Carbon Storage Based on Life Cycle Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Procedia","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon footprint; Greenhouse gas; Copying; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Life-cycle assessment; Climate change; Environmental economics; Environmental engineering; Computer science; Natural resource economics; Production (economics); Waste management; Process engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002853078,0.0002025839,0.0003163313,0.00005782401,0.0002048074,0.00003906597,0.000329507,0.00009506975,0.0002099269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002303839,0.0001913016,0.0001379721,0.0001489708,0.0003394922,0.0001000375,0.0002660235,0.0001230242,0.000002008181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002547135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003811678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007855849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007120923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985515,0.00005548678,0.0002772269,0.0004094057,0.0003995859,0.000306823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986265,0.00006006894,0.0002497416,0.0008425779,0.000006297113,0.000214757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005022821,0.0001407051,0.9101206,0.00002282932,0.00005803923,0.00001884464,0.0001615501,0.08370946,0.004135025,0.0000415592,0.000005934438,0.001535209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004561798,0.0001308281,0.9082273,0.00001630174,0.0001155754,6.289573e-7,0.0001796054,0.0722905,0.0177375,0.0002571269,0.0002705058,0.0003179457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9525828,0.00003219963,0.00004385941,0.0001523417,0.0000589566,0.00009319462,0.0000030415,0.00003389107,0.04699967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993678,0.000009671224,0.0002051072,0.0001576535,0.00003280427,0.00002059031,0.000005071599,0.00002003827,0.0001812076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04681846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00926112059943535,"score_gpt":0.2252159413366944,"score_spread":0.215954820737259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}