{"id":"W2621257648","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1433","title":"Ranking LGBT inclusion: Diversity ranking systems as institutional archetypes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Transgender; Ranking (information retrieval); Lesbian; Archetype; Set (abstract data type); Checklist; Work (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Social psychology; Gender studies; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03885866,0.0003976606,0.0005286545,0.008865872,0.004469725,0.01582103,0.001341895,0.001075081,0.008436487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06322289,0.0003259476,0.0004792481,0.00726438,0.008084161,0.008927401,0.009640984,0.001799754,0.0006454613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01174451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008815354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007060087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01090171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9391546,0.04621872,0.002063843,0.00154477,0.009318091,0.001699965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9298221,0.03374488,0.009575845,0.007654998,0.0149878,0.004214334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004494857,0.0005174114,0.07481116,0.0007681614,0.0001129785,0.0001369236,0.02125929,0.006163562,0.001347589,0.4559967,0.01348021,0.4249565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002225176,0.001508138,0.1423502,0.002395314,0.000233019,0.0002880094,0.09873347,0.03714809,0.006218038,0.5205486,0.1899059,0.0004487273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.46519,0.00200271,0.1394127,0.03096217,0.0004371995,0.001600517,0.001362552,0.0009556002,0.3580765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528166,0.0002201103,0.04301222,0.0004121645,0.00006389371,0.0002934803,0.0002351614,0.00004778244,0.002898536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03885866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2055067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1649493816583759,"score_gpt":0.3278297061382359,"score_spread":0.1628803244798601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}