{"id":"W2621257648","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1433","title":"Ranking LGBT inclusion: Diversity ranking systems as institutional archetypes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Transgender; Ranking (information retrieval); Lesbian; Archetype; Set (abstract data type); Checklist; Work (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Social psychology; Gender studies; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003020517,0.0002547573,0.0003264259,0.0005857786,0.01839731,0.00346177,0.002047186,0.0001130743,0.0001277661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001579509,0.0002307239,0.0001331613,0.0006309638,0.008417449,0.005670208,0.0002825433,0.0002948499,0.00001809949],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005240233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006705982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07062079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3036298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997591,0.00005227647,0.0005706112,0.0004110309,0.0004411704,0.0009339619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974962,0.0001028075,0.001051878,0.0002369601,0.0006961314,0.0004159832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004395214,0.00002824458,0.08100274,0.0001048932,0.00002631918,0.001348109,0.002904759,0.001245794,0.0002921832,0.9115969,0.0001300922,0.001276044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001105314,0.00198925,0.1194008,0.001610973,0.0001983926,0.003626014,0.02683712,0.00912082,0.0005489965,0.8225355,0.01163427,0.001392554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9155504,0.0002067709,0.0004339858,0.001953416,0.001074987,0.0001592406,0.00001558871,0.00001295719,0.08059264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978034,0.00001022909,0.0004830842,0.0005479478,0.0009915222,0.000003989996,0.00000413162,0.000006682279,0.0001489571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.233009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1649493816583759,"score_gpt":0.3278297061382359,"score_spread":0.1628803244798601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}