{"id":"W2621498432","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2017.05.032","title":"Optimal tax policy under heterogeneous environmental preferences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Environmental tax; Environmental policy; Tax policy; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Tax reform","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002182241,0.0005104562,0.001383632,0.0008525,0.0005572046,0.003107454,0.000688568,0.002025757,0.005426819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01029061,0.0007170995,0.0005138455,0.0009323157,0.001293172,0.003743631,0.001005869,0.001928724,0.0003282017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003106552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002510011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01089533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007105388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992661,0.000330587,0.00003145751,0.0001000395,0.00006402508,0.0002079212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965503,0.002369909,0.0004499862,0.0001517443,0.0002441584,0.0002338696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000325956,0.0001734923,0.001875868,0.0001029703,0.0001069524,0.0002060601,0.0001210974,0.4273456,0.0005933709,0.5511332,0.005831018,0.0121844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001487415,0.00002530636,0.00118069,0.0000312687,0.00003854473,0.00003266277,0.0002066691,0.3566535,0.0002817336,0.6398276,0.001553555,0.00001974076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8045233,0.001378466,0.1070687,0.02857994,0.0003903325,0.0001115952,0.001109679,0.0001931884,0.05664477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867119,0.0006374278,0.00451942,0.0005030912,0.0001253098,0.00002797603,0.0001517108,0.00002893224,0.007294241],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01089533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02253968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03233728789770074,"score_gpt":0.2126771389183229,"score_spread":0.1803398510206222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}