{"id":"W2621663954","doi":"10.1007/s10982-017-9306-4","title":"Pragmatic Maxims and Presumptions in Legal Interpretation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Pragmatics; Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Defeasible estate; Grice; Relation (database); Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02158641,0.0009104252,0.001921851,0.003538211,0.005312437,0.01234482,0.003725647,0.009020628,0.007915667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05003155,0.00221453,0.001801093,0.003484,0.04260898,0.03263652,0.007384379,0.01043842,0.001019878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005920654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003356706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00243586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001893472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9786732,0.01445835,0.001383019,0.001756249,0.002885035,0.0008441927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607674,0.03243958,0.001522416,0.003027188,0.001550996,0.0006924389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006474265,0.000005789519,0.00003547488,0.00002454582,0.000004935197,0.00002339348,0.0005990012,0.0002825609,0.00002086141,0.9972975,0.0003110053,0.001388459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004439554,0.000001539359,0.00001783816,0.00001156958,0.000002391716,0.000009248917,0.00008220365,0.0004871421,0.00001684061,0.9987032,0.0006603206,0.000003166023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05461133,0.009614237,0.5150821,0.0668916,0.001130836,0.0002736429,0.0003644672,0.0001913145,0.3518405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289126,0.001676658,0.05814384,0.001684131,0.0008855165,0.0004157522,0.0001339362,0.00009431277,0.008053233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02158641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1141612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0198499152042622,"score_gpt":0.2661959494199299,"score_spread":0.2463460342156677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}